2008年3月17日星期一

Whether there is an English word “Firstly”

By Bai Dongyi

I was astonished when I heard the word “firstly” doesn’t exist. So I decide to search for some information to try to get the truth.

First (I doesn’t use “firstly”), I look up the word in several English dictionaries. Here are the results:



Collins COBUILD Advanced Learner's English Dictionary (Published by HarperCollins Publishers Ltd)


firstly

You use firstly in speech or writing when you want to give a reason, make a point, or mention an item that will be followed by others connected with it.
The program is now seven years behind schedule as a result, firstly of increased costs, then of technical problems.
Vitamin C has many roles to play in weight control. Firstly, it is needed for hormone production.
ADV: ADV with cl/group
= in the first place


The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language

(Fourth Edition copyright ©2000 by Houghton Mifflin Company, updated in 2003 and Published by Houghton Mifflin Company.)


firstly

adv.
In the first place; to begin with.
Usage Note: It is well established that either first or firstly can be used to begin an enumeration: Our objectives are, first (or firstly), to recover from last year's slump. Any succeeding items should be introduced by words parallel to the form that is chosen, as in first... second... third or firstly... secondly... thirdly.

Longman Dictionary of Contemporary English

firstly

/ˈfəːstli US -əːr-/ adv [sentence adverb]
used to say that the fact or reason that you are going to mention is the first one and will be followed by others
finally, lastly lastly
 Firstly, I would like to thank everyone who has contributed to this success.

In the Oxford dictionary, I can’t find the word.


Second, I look up the word in online dictionary websites as well:

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/firstly

4 results for: firstly

first·ly /ˈfɜrstli/ Pronunciation Key - Show Spelled Pronunciation[furst-lee] Pronunciation Key - Show IPA Pronunciation

–adverb

in the first place; first.

[Origin: 1525–35; first + -ly]

Dictionary.com Unabridged (v 1.1)
Based on the Random House Unabridged Dictionary, © Random House, Inc. 2006.

American Heritage Dictionary - Cite This Source - Share This

first·ly (fûrst'lē) Pronunciation Key
adv. In the first place; to begin with.


Usage Note: It is well established that either first or firstly can be used to begin an enumeration: Our objectives are, first (or firstly), to recover from last year's slump. Any succeeding items should be introduced by words parallel to the form that is chosen, as in first . . . second . . . third or firstly . . . secondly . . . thirdly.






firstly


adverb

before anything else; "first we must consider the garter snake" [syn: first]



WordNet® 3.0, © 2006 by Princeton University.

Kernerman English Multilingual Dictionary (Beta Version) - Cite This Source - Share This
ˈ

firstly adverb

in the first place
Example: I have three reasons for not going — firstly, it's cold, secondly, I'm tired, and thirdly, I don't want to!



Cambridge Advanced Learner's Dictionary

http://dictionary.cambridge.org/define.asp?key=29121&dict=CALD

firstly

adverb (ALSO first)
used to refer to the first thing in a list:
There are two very good reasons why we can't do it. Firstly, we don't have enough money, and secondly, we don't have enough time.


Well, in my view, words belong to languages and languages live in people’s life rather than in dictionaries. So I use 2 popular search engines to check how often people use the word “firstly”. The results are as follow:


Google

http://www.google.com/search?as_q=firstly&hl=zh-CN&num=10&btnG=Google+%E6%90%9C%E7%B4%A2&as_epq=&as_oq=&as_eq=&lr=lang_en&cr=&as_ft=i&as_filetype=&as_qdr=all&as_occt=any&as_dt=i&as_sitesearch=&as_rights=

We get 2,170,000 results.


Yahoo

http://search.yahoo.com/search?p=firstly&fr=yfp-t-501&toggle=1&cop=mss&ei=UTF-8&fp_ip=HK

We get 57,300,000 results.

We have to admit that many people use “firstly” on the Internet.




Third, I also find some discussions about the existence of “firstly”. Here is one.

http://www.english-test.net/forum/ftopic6409.html


Jasna :

Hello everybody.
Our teacher of speaking/writing skills told us the other day that many of us made a mistake in our essay using 'firstly', 'secondly' etc. (we were supposed to clarify a certain point of view, i.e. to provide reasons). Her exact words were: 'Where did you come across those words? They do not exist in English'. I checked several dictionaries and all of them contained entries 'firstly' and 'secondly'. I am totally confused because she lived in the UK for many years and is a good speaker of English in general.
Can anybody prove her wrong?
Thanks,

Alan :

Hi Jasna,
I'd hate to come between you and your teacher but I must say that firstly was first used in the sense of in the first place in the 17th century and secondly probably during the 18th century and this is verified in the Oxford English Dictionary which is based as they say on historical principles. This means that the use of words is recorded as and when they were first used.


Finally, I think languages are only tools for people to communicate. Language does not stay unchanged. Every day, new words and new usages of words come to being. Languages are created by people. Maybe, once everyone can understand each other, there is no point to argue whether a word is wrong or right.

Info about Iceland

Dong edited

CPI

Consumer price index from 1939


Consumer price index

Base from 1939

Base from 1968

Base from 1981

Base from 1984

Base from1988

Average for year

CPI





1939

102.9

.

.

.

.

1940

128

.

.

.

.

1941

159.7

.

.

.

.

1942

205.6

.

.

.

.

1943

256.2

.

.

.

.

1944

267.8

.

.

.

.

1945

277.2

.

.

.

.

1946

292.7

.

.

.

.

1947

315

.

.

.

.

1948

321.5

.

.

.

.

1949

330.2

.

.

.

.

1950

420

.

.

.

.

1951

536.6

.

.

.

.

1952

602.5

.

.

.

.

1953

599.5

.

.

.

.

1954

605.6

.

.

.

.

1955

631

.

.

.

.

1956

695.4

.

.

.

.

1957

724.2

.

.

.

.

1958

767.3

.

.

.

.

1959

777.6

.

.

.

.

1960

792.5

.

.

.

.

1961

830.3

.

.

.

.

1962

921.2

.

.

.

.

1963

1,040.70

.

.

.

.

1964

1,243.20

.

.

.

.

1965

1,332.50

.

.

.

.

1966

1,475.10

.

.

.

.

1967

1,524.50

.

.

.

.

1968

1,767.70

105.6

.

.

.

1969

2,150.80

128.5

.

.

.

1970

2,432.90

145.4

.

.

.

1971

2,588.00

154.6

.

.

.

1972

2,857.10

170.7

.

.

.

1973

3,490.20

208.6

.

.

.

1974

4,992.20

298.3

.

.

.

1975

7,436.50

444.4

.

.

.

1976

9,829.00

587.3

.

.

.

1977

12,822.10

766.2

.

.

.

1978

18,473.40

1,103.90

.

.

.

1979

26,870.90

1,605.70

.

.

.

1980

42,603.40

2,545.80

.

.

.

1981

64,274.10

3,840.70

118.4

.

.

1982

97,064.70

5,800.20

178.9

.

.

1983

178,866.50

10,688.30

329.6

.

.

1984

231,042.60

13,806.10

425.8

107.2

.

1985

305,843.40

18,275.90

563.6

142

.

1986

370,898.80

22,163.70

683.5

172.2

.

1987

440,498.50

26,322.30

811.8

204.5

.

1988

552,634.30

33,023.00

1,018.40

256.5

104.6

1989

669,127.50

39,984.60

1,233.10

310.6

126.7

1990

768,405.70

45,916.40

1,416.00

356.7

145.5

1991

820,625.70

49,036.80

1,512.30

380.9

155.4

1992

851,521.50

50,883.00

1,569.20

395.3

161.2

1993

886,505.50

52,973.50

1,633.60

411.5

167.8

1994

899,721.60

53,763.20

1,658.00

417.6

170.3

1995

914,592.00

54,651.80

1,685.40

424.6

173.2

1996

935,346.00

55,891.90

1,723.70

434.2

177.1

1997

952,182.70

56,898.00

1,754.70

442

180.3

1998

968,161.00

57,852.80

1,784.20

449.4

183.3

1999

1,001,228.30

59,828.70

1,845.10

464.8

189.6

2000

1,051,929.30

62,858.40

1,938.50

488.3

199.1

2001

1,121,733.00

67,029.60

2,067.10

520.7

212.4

2002

1,176,072.00

70,276.60

2,167.30

545.9

222.6

2003

1,200,689.00

71,747.60

2,212.60

557.3

227.3

2004

1,239,398.00

74,060.60

2,284.00

575.3

234.6

2005

1,289,223.00

77,038.00

2,375.80

598.5

244.1

2006

1,376,602.00

82,259.30

2,536.80

639

260.6

2007

1,445,799.30

86,394.20

2,664.30

671.1

273.7

2008

.

.

.

.

.






Unemployment:



Iceland






































Unemployment rate





































Country/Series-specific Notes

Scale

Units

1976

1977

1978

1979

1980

1981

1982

1983

1984

1985

1986

1987

1988

1989

1990

1991

1992

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

Estimates Start After

Definition: Unemployment rate, national definition Source: Directorate of Labour of Iceland. Latest actual data: 2006 Primary domestic currency: Icelandic krónur Data last updated: 07/2007

Percent of total labor force

0.5

0.4

0.3

0.3

0.3

0.4

0.7

1

1.3

0.9

0.7

0.4

0.6

1.7

1.8

1.5

3

4.4

4.8

5

4.4

3.9

2.8

1.9

1.3

1.4

2.5

3.4

3.1

2.1

1.3

2

3.2

2006




1974-84

1985

1986

1987

1988

1989

1990

1991

1992

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

















Participation rate

74.6

79.4

81

84.2

80.2

78.9

77.5

76.2

75.5

75.4

75.4

75.7

76.3

76.6

77.1

77.3

77

76.9

76.7

77






59.62











source:OECD







































Source: EOI 2007

冰岛的participation rate一向很高,而且一直较为平稳。冰岛不论男女的participation rate均居世界前列,想来这也是他们社会稳定的一个重要因素。

以下是我看到的一些事件,找不到更为详细的资料,也不是很清楚能不能对分析起到帮助。

1987 tax-free

1988 economic crisis

1995 join WTO



2001

13.2

17.2

9.1

13.3

52.8

2002

10.8

10.7

6.1

7.5

35.1

2003

6.7

6

9.9

8.2

30.8

2004

7.7

3.9

7.2

9.7

28.5

2005

8.9

9.7

14

7.3

39.9

2006

8.3

8.5

4.8

6.5

28.1












Problems

  1. 由于冰岛经济发展迅速,失业率低,可能会出现劳动力短缺的问题。所以冰岛会引进外来劳务,外来员工成为生力军

2. 捕鱼业,由于海产品出口量减少,渔民收入减少,出现本行业就业人数减少的情况。

3.通货膨胀居高不下,引起劳资矛盾并导致民众罢工

4.建築和服務等行業勞力缺乏,導致歐盟新成員國勞工大量涌入冰就業市場。
5.
通货膨胀困扰经济发展,在04年初和06年都有明显体现,但是政府对通胀的控制也是很有力度的。有的资料显示在一定时期冰岛的通胀率又是相当低的。

6.对外贸易逆差巨大,主要是因为大多自然资源匮乏需要进口,比如石油;

而且产业结构单一:冰島經濟結構保持以漁業為主,能源型工業、高科技產業、旅遊業和農業並重的格局。进出口结构如下:出口的產品及份額:海產品54%,工業製品38.6%,農產品1.6%,其他產品5.8%。進口的產品及份額:工業原材料26.9%,資本貨物26.4%,交通工具15.9%,消費品15.1%。燃油和潤滑油9.4%,食品和飲料6.3%

7.1995年,冰岛的失业率曾有过一次大幅度的波动。网上找不到缘由,只发现冰岛于1995年加入了世贸组织。冰岛的迁移劳动力不断增加,冰岛人也不得不和其他国家的人竞争。就这点来看,冰岛的国民似乎似乎缺乏竞争力,难以适应一时间的开放状态,但恢复地也很快。不知以后还会不会重演。从另一方面看,其实它还是很容易受外部世界影响的。相较之下,石油危机似乎没有给冰岛带来太大的问题。

8工业基础薄弱,主要发展能源密集型产业,工业产品单一(主要是铝);

9经济对外依赖程度较高,经济独立性较弱

,大量产品依赖进口;另一方面,出口产品单一,出口资源匮乏。贸易逆差的不断增加,成为冰岛经济发展的一大障碍

10. Iceland的增长很大程度上是受labor force的影响的(相较表上的其他国家),但是它又是人口增长主要靠immigrants的。依赖外来人口而不是本国人口,对于Iceland的这样一个相对小国家会是个问题。

11 除了渔业、水利和地热资源丰富,其他自然资源匮乏,石油等产品需要进口。

12 工业基础薄弱,除渔产品加工和针织等轻工业外,工业以炼铝等高能耗工业为主。








Prospects:

1.前几年出现经济发展过热的态势,由于宏观调控,经济发展会保持良好湿透,就业态势良好,失业率还会维持在一个低水平。

2.产业结构已发生变化,工业品出口比重加大 ,会造成劳动人员的再分配,会出现部分结构性失业,但而近年来旅游业发展迅速,定会创造就业机会

3. 经济应该会平稳增长,但是涨幅不会太大。

4严重的通货膨胀使得总体经济增速趋缓,国民经济将会维持低速稳步增长;

5经济结构难有变化;

6贸易逆差持续出现。

7.由它的主要产业fishing来看,没有什么太大的变化,略微增长。加上它本身的政治特点,不太会受到太多的影响。所以,基本比较平稳的发展。

8.冰岛有独特的自然风光和发达的交通,可以大力发展旅游业。20073月,“世界论坛”杂志对世界124个国家旅游行业竞争力进行了一项对比调查,冰岛名列第4




比较

Table 4. Sources of growth of output, 1970–1992, traditional method, per cent

Table 5. Sources of growth of output, 1970–1992, per cent

Total Factor Productivity Growth



A

B

US

0.8

2

Australia

1.5

1.4

Ireland

-0.7

4

France

0.1

1

Norway

-1.3

2.2

Sweden

-0.8

1.8

Canada

-0.5

1.2

Denmark

0

1

NZ

0.7

0.8

Iceland

-1.5

1.6

Switzerland

0.5

0.2

Japan

-0.1

0.3

Germany

-1.6

0.9

UK

-1.1

0.8

Belgium

-1.9

0.9

Netherlands

-1.9

0.6

Spain

-1.7

0.2

Italy

-3.2

-0.3




Column A= Difference between TFP growth

in 1996-2004 and TFP growth in 1966-75

Column B = TFP growth rate in 1996-2004